Does a Zero-Tolerance Approach to Safety Make Us Safer? Or, Does It Increase Safety Problems and Injury Severity?

white, yellow and blue hard safety helmet hat for safety project of workman as engineer or worker, on concrete floor on city.

Zero-tolerance safety policies in construction are often implemented with the goal of reducing risks, but these policies can have unintended consequences. When workers know they may face severe disciplinary action for reporting safety concerns or mistakes, they may remain silent. This silence can prevent the identification of potential hazards, reduce opportunities for improvement and ultimately put workers at greater risk.

Flexibility in Safety Approaches

Instead of rigid punitive measures, there are more effective strategies that promote safety while allowing flexibility to address complex issues.

  • Inspire Open Conversation: One approach is to encourage open dialogue about near-misses or safety incidents by offering limited immunity to those who report them. This immunity does not apply to criminal offenses or habitual unsafe behavior, but it removes the fear of punishment for reporting incidents, which fosters a more transparent and proactive safety culture.

  • Foster Safe Reporting: In a safety culture that encourages reporting, companies can address the root causes of unsafe conditions and take corrective actions before serious accidents occur. Employees will be more likely to speak up, knowing that their concerns will be met with support and solutions rather than retribution.

Fostering Open Safety Reporting

One of the key lessons from the aviation industry is the power of voluntary reporting programs in improving safety across an organization. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has shifted from a purely forensic, post-incident analysis of accidents, to a proactive strategy that leverages flight data, government information, and voluntary safety reporting from airline employees. This approach has led to significant safety improvements across training, operations, and maintenance procedures.

For instance, the FAA’s Aircraft Certification Safety Review Process (SRP) allows employees to report safety concerns without fear of retaliation. By fostering a non-punitive environment, the FAA encourages open reporting of safety risks, leading to timely interventions. Similarly, the Aviation Safety Action Program (ASAP) promotes voluntary reporting of safety concerns by airline and repair station employees, with corrective actions focused on addressing issues rather than disciplining individuals. These programs have been critical in identifying potential accident precursors and improving overall aviation safety.

The construction industry can benefit from adopting similar voluntary reporting frameworks. Construction companies can create programs that provide limited immunity for employees reporting near-misses or hazards, encouraging transparency. These systems help identify systemic risks early, enabling the organization to address them before they escalate into serious problems. By removing the fear of retribution, construction workers can actively participate in creating a safer environment.

Strategies for Targeting Unsafe Behaviors

In addition to encouraging reporting, construction companies can develop specific strategies to target unsafe behaviors without sacrificing safety. For example, additional support and training can be provided for individuals who are at risk of safety violations. For employees involved in unsafe activities or demonstrating habitually unsafe behavior, corrective actions can be tailored to ensure that they understand the severity of their actions while providing a path for improvement.

By modifying the zero-tolerance approach to safety, companies allow more flexibility for workers to use their judgment when responding to incidents. Safety issues become opportunities for learning and improvement rather than occasions for fear and punishment. This approach creates a culture of continuous learning and compassion, where the focus is on making everyone safer rather than enforcing punitive measures.

Compassion and Continuous Improvement

The key to achieving a zero-injury environment is not through punishment, but through fostering a culture of openness and collaboration. By encouraging employees to speak up and report safety concerns without fear of reprisal, companies can reduce both the number of accidents and the severity of injuries. This type of forward-thinking approach not only empowers workers but aligns with the overarching goal of ensuring that everyone returns home safely at the end of the day.

Construction companies can draw on lessons from the aviation industry’s voluntary reporting programs to build a similar culture in their own workplaces. By prioritizing proactive safety measures and creating an environment where employees feel safe reporting risks, we can achieve a safer, more effective safety culture.

Travis Vap is the CEO of South Valley, a Denver-based wall and ceiling contractor. In addition to being CEO of South Valley, he served as AWCI president (2022–2023), SFIA Board Member (2014–2018), AWCI Board Member (2012–2024), AWCI Interior and Exterior Steel Framing Committee chair (2013–2017) and AWCI Emerging Leader co-chair (2024–present).
Travis Vap is the CEO of South Valley, a Denver-based wall and ceiling contractor. In addition to being CEO of South Valley, he served as AWCI president (2022–2023), SFIA Board Member (2014–2018), AWCI Board Member (2012–2024), AWCI Interior and Exterior Steel Framing Committee chair (2013–2017) and AWCI Emerging Leader co-chair (2024–present).

Browse Similar Articles

You May Also Like

On March 7, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) levied over $15,000 in fines to Smith Foundry in Minneapolis.
A car seat belt buckled.
The great thing about AWCI’s Peer Safety Review experience is the learning doesn’t happen just at the job site or in a conference room; learning also happens around the breakfast table or
AWCI's Construction Dimensions cover

Renew or Subscribe Today!